PA says it will submit anti-settlement UN resolution within days

Netanyahu calls on Obama not to back Mideast moves at UN in twilight of term.

A United Nations Security Council meeting at UN headquarters in New York. (photo credit: REUTERS)
A United Nations Security Council meeting at UN headquarters in New York.
(photo credit: REUTERS)
Just hours after the Palestinian leadership said it plans to move forward a UN Security Council resolution condemning settlements, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday he expects US President Barack Obama will not support action against Israel at the world body.
“[We will] begin to submit a resolution condemning settlements to the UN Security Council in the coming days,” Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki told the Voice of Palestine, the official PA radio station.
On numerous occasions over the past few months, the leadership, including PA President Mahmoud Abbas, said it intends to submit a resolution.
If such a resolution is brought before the Security Council, all eyes will be on Obama to see how the US acts.
In 2011, the US vetoed a UNSC resolution condemning the settlements. By contrast, in 1979 – under president Jimmy Carter – it abstained on an anti-settlement vote, allowing it to pass.
PLO Executive Committee Member Ahmad Majdalani told The Jerusalem Post on Monday he believes the US will abstain this time, as well.
“We have ongoing contacts with the US administration about the forthcoming UNSC resolution and our assessment is that the US will abstain from taking a position,” he said.
Netanyahu, at a memorial ceremony on Mount Herzl for soldiers killed in the 1956 Sinai campaign, contrasted the strong US support Israel enjoys today to what existed in 1956 when the US and Russia compelled Israel to withdraw from the Sinai.
“I expect that in the twilight of President Obama’s tenure he will stand by what he said in 2011, that the way to achieve peace does not run through Security Council resolutions, but rather direct negotiations with the Palestinians, which has been the US position for years,” said Netanyahu.
At the UN General Assembly in 2011, Obama said of the Mideast conflict: “Peace will not come through statements and resolutions at the United Nations – if it were that easy, it would have been accomplished by now.”

Stay updated with the latest news!

Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter


Ultimately, he said, “it is the Israelis and the Palestinians who must live side-by-side. Ultimately, it is the Israelis and the Palestinians – not us – who must reach agreement on the issues that divide them: on borders and on security, on refugees and Jerusalem.”
Netanyahu has referenced this speech numerous times in recent months amid concerns that Obama might support some measure at the UN inimical to Israel’s interest in the final days of his presidency.
Israeli diplomatic officials said that while Jerusalem was carefully following the issue, it was speculative, at this time, to say whether the Palestinians would indeed bring a resolution and how the US would respond if they did.
Maliki, in his interview, added that states affiliated with the Non-Alignment Movement and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation already have pledged to support a resolution against the settlements, and consultations with Arab states are ongoing. Abbas attended both the meeting of the OIC in March and the Non-Alignment Movement in September, where he called on member states to support a UNSC resolution condemning settlements.
Jordan and other Arab states reportedly were disappointed the Palestinians insisted on advancing a UNSC resolution in December 2014 that called for Israel to withdraw to the Green Line within three years.
Abbas and PLO Executive Committee Secretary- General Saeb Erakat have since renewed their commitments to coordinate the submission of UNSC resolutions with their Arab counterparts.
One Western diplomatic official said the Arab Quartet – Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates – has not been overly supportive of an anti-settlement resolution at this time. The reason, the official said, is because these countries do not want to give Abbas any “prize” as he continues to thwart the orderly succession process they want to see put into motion inside Fatah.