Question of who's responsible for intel on terrorists rages within intelligence community; gov't expected to rule in coming weeks.
By YAAKOV KATZBeduins inspect their weapons in the Sinai Peninsula 370 (R)(photo credit: Asmaa Waguih / Reuters)
Who is responsible for gathering intelligence on terrorist organizations in the Sinai Peninsula? This question is raging within Israel’s intelligence community and the government is expected to rule on it in the coming weeks.Israel has three primary intelligence agencies: Military Intelligence in the IDF, responsible for gathering intelligence for military purposes such as creating targets; the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency), responsible for the Palestinian territories; and the Mossad, responsible for overseas intelligence gathering.For decades, since a peace deal was signed with Egypt, the defense establishment cut back on its intelligence-gathering efforts there – although it continued to keep an eye on Cairo, mainly in regard to military maneuvers and procurement.Now, however, with the upsurge in terrorist activity in the Sinai, there is a renewed discussion and power struggle over the question of which agency is responsible for the area.At the heart of the issue is more than simple prestige, since the agency eventually assigned the task will likely see a major boost to its budget to build up the necessary capabilities.For years, a similar struggle took place between Military Intelligence and the Mossad over Iran and its nuclear program.The Mossad – which was ultimately tapped by former prime minister Ariel Sharon with the task of leading Israeli intelligence efforts vis-à-vis Iran – saw its annual budget grow by close to half a billion dollars in 2007.There appear to be strong arguments for both Military Intelligence and the Shin Bet.The Shin Bet claims, for example, that the terrorist infrastructure being established in Sinai is mostly linked to Palestinian terror groups in the Gaza Strip.On the other hand, Military Intelligence argues that Sinai is outside of Israel’s borders and that the terrorist infrastructure there is not always connected to the known terror groups in Gaza.
In contrast to Gaza, where Israel faces a number of organized and structured terror groups, in Sinai there are groups of people who are connected by a similar ideology, but usually join together as needed to perpetrate attacks.The terrorists who carried out the attack on Sunday night are also believed to have been local Beduin from Sinai, as was the case in the cross-border attack last August near the Netafim Crossing that killed eight Israelis.
