US House holds Steve Bannon in contempt, seeks prosecution

The Democratic-led chamber voted 229 to 202, with nine Republicans joining Democrats to recommend the charges against former Trump advisor Steve Bannon.

Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon attends the National Front party convention in Lille, France, March 10, 2018 (photo credit: PASCAL ROSSIGNOL/REUTERS)
Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon attends the National Front party convention in Lille, France, March 10, 2018
(photo credit: PASCAL ROSSIGNOL/REUTERS)

Longtime Donald Trump ally Steve Bannon could face criminal prosecution for refusing to cooperate with a probe into the deadly Jan. 6 attack on the US Capitol after the House of Representatives voted Thursday to hold him in contempt of Congress.

The Democratic-led chamber voted 229 to 202, with nine Republicans joining Democrats to recommend the charges against Bannon, who served as chief strategist for the Republican former president.

US Attorney General Merrick Garland will make the final decision on whether to prosecute.

Bannon has refused to comply with subpoenas from the Jan. 6 Select Committee seeking documents and his testimony, citing Trump's insistence - disputed by some legal scholars - that his communications are protected by the legal doctrine of executive privilege.

"What sort of precedent would it set for the House of Representatives if we allow a witness to ignore us flat out without facing any consequences?" Democrat Bennie Thompson, chairman of the Select Committee, said in debate before the vote.

The select committee voted unanimously on Tuesday in favor of the charges.

President Donald Trump, joined by (left to right) Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, Vice President Mike Pence, senior adviser Steve Bannon, Communications Director Sean Spicer and National Security Advisor Michael Flynn (credit: REUTERS)
President Donald Trump, joined by (left to right) Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, Vice President Mike Pence, senior adviser Steve Bannon, Communications Director Sean Spicer and National Security Advisor Michael Flynn (credit: REUTERS)

THREAT OF JAIL TIME

The Democratic-led panel hopes the threat of jail time - contempt of Congress carries a penalty of up to one year in prison and a $100,000 fine - will encourage cooperation from the 18 other Trump aides and rally organizers who also have been subpoenaed.

Garland has yet to indicate how the department will respond. He told a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday the department would "apply the facts and the law" and make decisions "consistent with the principles of prosecution."

Most of Trump's fellow Republicans in Congress opposed creating either an independent commission or a select committee to investigate the events surrounding Jan. 6. That day thousands of Trump supporters descended on the Capitol after he urged them in a fiery speech to protest his defeat by Democrat Joe Biden in a November 2020 election that Trump falsely claims was stolen.

Only two Republicans - Representatives Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger - are on the nine-member select committee.


Stay updated with the latest news!

Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter


They were joined by seven other Republicans in backing the House contempt resolution. Representative Greg Pence, whose brother, former Vice President Mike Pence, was forced to flee from the crowds on Jan. 6, did not vote.

A spokeswoman said later Pence had a family medical emergency and would have voted no.

Most of the Republicans who voted to hold Bannon in contempt also voted earlier this year to impeach Trump over the Jan. 6 riot.

The contempt of Congress statute, passed in 1857, states that the Justice Department has a duty to bring a House contempt citation before a grand jury.

But the Justice Department historically has said it makes the ultimate decision about whether to prosecute individuals who defy congressional subpoenas. The last successful prosecution for contempt of Congress was in 1974 when a judge found Watergate conspirator G. Gordon Liddy guilty.

Arguing against the resolution in the House, Republican Representative Jim Banks accused the committee of political motives for pursuing Bannon, who played a major role in Trump's 2016 election victory.

"Steve Bannon was a private citizen before, after and during Jan. 6. So why is the select committee interested in Steve Bannon? It's simple. He's a Democrat party bogeyman," Banks said.

Four people died on the day of the assault, and one Capitol police officer died the next day after being injured while defending the seat of government. Hundreds of police officers were injured and four have since taken their own lives.

 

PREDICTED 'EXTREME EVENTS'

The select committee argued that Bannon had made statements suggesting he knew ahead of time about "extreme events" that would take place on Jan. 6, when Congress was scheduled to certify Biden as the winner of the presidential election.

Bannon said on a Jan. 5 podcast that "all hell is going to break loose tomorrow." The next day, mobs of Trump supporters, many chanting "Stop the Steal" and "Hang Mike Pence," attacked the Capitol as Vice President Pence and lawmakers met to certify the election.

"Mr. Bannon's own public statements make clear: he knew what was going to happen before it did ... The American people deserve to know what he knew, and what he did," Cheney, who is vice chair of the Select Committee, said during debate.

The assault forced members of Congress, staff and journalists to flee as crowds rampaged through the building, vandalizing offices and hallways, smashing windows and stealing computers and other equipment.

Trump has continued to insist falsely that his defeat was the result of fraud. Multiple courts, state election officials and members of Trump's own administration have rejected that claim.