I wish @vicenews would at least check if dams in south Israel existed before asking us if we used it to flood #Gaza http://t.co/5chi3lyh4V
— Libby Weiss (@Libby_weiss) February 24, 2015
The intentional flooding accusation was also published and propagated in a video by the AFP news agency, which included interviews from Gazans blaming Israel for the flooding. Even more embarrassing than the baseless dam-opening allegation propagated by these news outlets, the Daily Mail's article attempted to connect the flooding in Gaza with the Israel Electric Company's decision to cut power to the West Bank cities of Nablus and Jenin for 45 minutes on Monday due to a 1.9 billion shekel debt, reported Monday by The Jerusalem Post"The flooding was today compounded after an Israeli power company cut electricity to two of Gaza's major West Bank cities," said the Daily Mail's article, even after a few revisions of the article.As Gaza and the West Bank are unconnected, separate geographical entities, obviously: (1) power cuts in the West Bank do not effect Gaza flooding, and (2) the writer of the article tried to redraw the map of the Middle East to try to connect the baseless claim of intentional flooding in Gaza to a totally separate phenomenon happening in the West Bank. Even after striking out with this major geographical failure, The Daily Mail's article continued to attempt to make a connection, saying "The decision [to cut power to the West Bank cities] came hours after the flood waters had settled." Furthermore, the article, despite "happily" clarifying at the bottom that southern Israel has no dams, continued to run the accusation that Israel is responsible for the flooding.The current flooding in Gaza is undoubtedly a tragedy, and The Daily Mail is right to help publicize this. However, that tragedy should not be "compounded" by the tragedy of shabby journalism.