Turkey appears to be downplaying tensions with Israel in Syria. This comes as Israel has ramped up strikes on sites such as the T-4 Air Base (also known as the Tiyas Air Base) near Palmyra; Israeli media has openly said that this sends a message to Ankara.
Ankara is usually more bellicose and prone to shouting and threatening. Why has Turkey’s hotheaded President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has compared Israel to Nazi Germany in the past, held off on threats about Syria?
There are several answers. The first is the most obvious. Ankara wants to have positive ties with US President Donald Trump’s administration. It knows that the administration is very pro-Israel. It knows that Israel appears to have support in the White House that goes beyond support for any other country.
For instance, the Trump administration has been willing to challenge America’s traditional and historic allies, such as Canada, and also impose tariffs on friends and foes alike – but the administration is deeply supportive of Israel.
This might not always be the case, but it is now. This means that Israel has the ear of key administration members – more than Turkey. Ankara knows this and likely prefers not to rock the boat, at least not yet.
Turkey had close ties to the first Trump administration. It expects these ties to continue. However, it also knows that it must be careful not to anger the administration. Ankara has already conducted outreach, particularly with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
However, there has yet to be a high-profile meeting with Trump, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has already met with the American president and is already back in Washington for a new round of meetings.
Turkey was not afraid of challenging Israel during Trump’s first term. When the US moved its embassy to Jerusalem, Ankara led the opposition to the move.
Rethinking strategy
When the Abraham Accords were about to be signed, Turkey threatened to break relations with the UAE. It threatened Greece and also US forces in Syria. Ankara created chaos within NATO.
But it may rethink this strategy this time. Perhaps Turkey thinks that playing nice over Syria could be a long con of salesmanship. Basically, it wants things in Syria, but it can wait.
Turkey also may have been taken by surprise by how aggressive Israel was in Syria. Israel has carried out airstrikes for years in Syria, so its strikes were not particularly surprising.
However, the fact that Israeli media made it clear that strikes on T-4 or at a military airport near Hamas were a message to Ankara illustrates a new approach. This is preemption.
Israel usually let problems fester in the past, allowing Hamas or Hezbollah to grow very powerful. In Syria, the name of the game is preemption.
Ynet had an analysis this week that said, “Israel and Turkey ponder how to split Syria into spheres of influence until stable governance takes hold.”
The writer, Ron Ben-Yishai, a well-known expert, said, “As Israel and Turkey vie for influence in a post-[Bashar al-]Assad Syria, tensions rise over military and economic ambitions. While Israel seeks to counter Turkey’s growing presence, both nations explore mediated agreements to divide control until Syria stabilizes.”
Turkey can read this as well and understands that this message likely comes from the top of Israel’s circles of strategic thinking.
Israel may have gotten Gaza wrong and underestimated Hamas, but Ankara sees that Israel is not underestimating Turkey. Israel knows that Turkey wants to move into bases in Syria. Clearly, the messaging is designed to deter.
While Iran, the Houthis, and others may not have always been deterred, it appears that Ankara may be rethinking things. It remains to be seen how long this will continue.