The difference of a minute, 40 years later

The IOC’s position on the Israeli athletes is a travesty of the values it purports to uphold.

By ROBERT SARNER
The 11 Israeli athletes killed in 1972 Munich attack 370 (R) (photo credit: REUTERS / Handout)
The 11 Israeli athletes killed in 1972 Munich attack 370 (R)
(photo credit: REUTERS / Handout)
With the much-anticipated 2012 Summer Games soon to kick off in London, Canada already deserves a gold medal for an Olympic-related action off the field. An action that should be the source of great pride for all those who still subscribe to the original, albeit tarnished, ideals of the Olympic Games.
A few weeks ago, Canada became the first country to officially call on the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to hold a minute of silence at the Games in memory of the 11 Israeli athletes and coaches slain by Palestinian terrorists at the Munich Olympics in 1972. The vote in Parliament, passed unanimously, came after two Canadian cabinet ministers wrote to IOC president Jacques Rogge in support of a formal commemoration of the murdered sportsmen on the 40th anniversary of the massacre.
Since Israel made its request to the IOC in April on behalf of families of the victims, a growing number of people around the world have raised their voices for such a long-overdue gesture. In late June, others followed Canada’s lead as the US Senate and the Australian House of Representatives both unanimously passed resolutions calling on the IOC to reverse its position. Germany’s foreign minister also weighed in similarly.
So far, the IOC will have none of it.
Over the years, it has steadfastly refused proposals from the athletes’ relatives for a minute of silence at the Games, saying it would politicize the Games. This despite politics often being inextricably linked to the Olympics. At the 2008 and 2004 Olympics, Iran and Syria ordered their athletes not to compete against their Israeli counterparts in protest against the Jewish state, without the IOC doing anything. At the 2002 Winter Olympics, the IOC allowed the US team to walk in the Opening Ceremonies with a flag recovered from the ruins of the 9/11 terrorist attack on New York. In 1936, the IOC allowed Hitler to stage-manage the Berlin Games to glorify Nazi Germany.
It’s also worth noting the IOC has previously remembered deceased Olympic athletes during the Games. Two years ago at the Vancouver Olympics, a moment of silence was held during the opening ceremony for a Georgian luge competitor who had died during a training accident.
The IOC’s position on the Israeli athletes is a travesty of the values it purports to uphold. It’s consistent with the organization’s time-honored hypocrisy and corruption, and its draconian, Orwellian copyright enforcement. The IOC’s stance begs the question: how much is related to the fact that those who would be commemorated are Israeli? Is the IOC more worried about the reaction of Arab and other Islamic nations than with showing basic decency? WITH ITS greedy servitude to corporate money and political interests including some of the world’s most murderous dictatorships, the IOC seems to have forgotten that its priority is supposed to be the athletes.
This latest disgrace adds to the litany of IOC transgressions spanning decades.
Little wonder there’s so much disillusionment over the Olympics and cynicism at the sight of the shamelessly over-commercialized five rings.
As journalist Rosie Dimanno wrote so trenchantly in a recent column in The Toronto Star: “Four decades after the Munich Massacre, the Lords of the Rings continue to act as if 11 Israelis were never murdered by Palestinian terrorists smack in the middle of their gaudy sports spectacle – an atrocity that was not allowed to interfere with those 1972 Games, which proceeded as if nothing untoward had happened.

Stay updated with the latest news!

Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter

Subscribe Now
Through nine Summer Olympiads since, the IOC has staunchly refused to hold any official observance for the slain Israelis. They talk a good game – the global community of athletes, the spirit of brotherhood and peaceful competition – but it is hokum, the mendacity of satraps with selective amnesia and slippery virtue.”
It’s heartening to see such moral outrage mounting. With the clock ticking down to the Opening Ceremony in London on July 27, an international movement is now gaining ground to get the IOC to reverse its position. In addition to a global online petition that’s attracted 89,000 signatures and counting, public officials in half-a-dozen countries have come out in favor of the commemoration of Israeli athletes at the Opening Ceremony. With any luck, it will move the IOC to finally see the light and do the right thing. It would make for what would likely be the most poignant, most dignified minute at the London Olympics.
The writer, a former journalist in Israel, France and Canada, is the director of Communication and Public Affairs at Roots Canada in Toronto.