The security resolution is often the international community’s corroboration that Trump's move was "invalid," "illegitimate" and "absolutely worthless," Pompeo and Friedman said, claiming these accusations were baseless.
"President Trump’s Golan proclamation is entirely consistent with Resolution 242," they wrote, explaining that Syria was the only warring party in the Six-Day War to ignore the resolution in 1967. Syria later signed Resolution 338, which made 242 applicable to all.
Resolution 242 calls for every country to live “within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.” Israel has given back 88% of the territory it captured in 1967. But with regards to Israel and the Golan Heights, Pompeo and Friedman believe "Syria is a different story."
"In word and deed, Damascus has for 52 years rejected the negotiating framework of Resolution 242," the two official wrote. "It has maintained a state of war with Israel since Israel became independent in 1948," never allowing Israel to live in secure borders without threat.
"By affirming Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, the president has afforded Israel the only secure and recognized boundary that can exist under the circumstances—the objective of Resolution 242."
Friedman and Pompeo added that if Israel does not maintain control of the Golan Heights, Bashar Assad or Iran will take control, giving the world a choice, "a dictator of a non-functioning state or a peaceful and democratic ally."