During the last 10 months since Israel’s divisive coalition pushed for a judicial overhaul, many people in these times of polarization found themselves in a workplace where they were one of the few conservatives or few liberals around. Fortunately, Israelis are today united in the effort to eliminate Hamas from Gaza, but sadly this consensus emerged only as the result of the catastrophic events of the Simhat Torah war. A new study found that those whose values – political or otherwise – don’t match the majority in their organization felt they received less respect and as a result were less engaged at work. Moreover, their co-workers noticed their lack of engagement.
“It is a real issue that organizations face,” said management and human resources Prof. Tracy Dumas of Ohio State University’s Fisher College of Business and the lead author of the study. “Organizations know that it is valuable to have employees with different perspectives. But if those with different perspectives feel they aren’t respected and so aren’t fully participating in their jobs, organizations aren’t fully reaping the benefits of their unique perspectives.”
But the study did find a way that “value minorities” could feel more a part of their teams: by disclosing personal information about themselves to their colleagues that had nothing to do with the values about which they disagreed.
The study was published recently in the journal Organization Science under the title “Self-Disclosure and Respect: Understanding the Engagement of Value Minorities.”
“Value minorities” were defined as those whose core beliefs involving politics, religion or other important areas of life clash with the majority of people in their organizations. Dumas emphasized that the study examined values, not opinions. Values can inform opinions, but they are harder to change because they are embedded in the person’s sense of self, transcending individual issues.
The researchers conducted studies among full-time adult employees in an online setting, a student project group that worked together over a semester, and undergraduate students in the laboratory, all with similar results. The study of 389 full-time workers was conducted online. Participants read a workplace scenario in which they imagined themselves working closely with colleagues of the same rank on a workgroup. Some were told that their values clashed with co-workers on issues like communal responsibility, individual liberty, and safety and security, while others were told their values were similar.
To get at the importance of self-disclosure, some were told they often talked with colleagues about non-work topics like what they did over the weekend, including spending time with a friend, trying a new restaurant in town and talking about their favorite things on the menu. Others were told that they rarely discussed personal topics and usually only talked about work. Both groups were told they did not discuss their personal values.
All participants then reported if they felt their colleagues would respect them on a scale of one (strongly disagree) to seven (strongly agree).
Participants were then told about an important group meeting coming up in which they would be discussing how to secure a new and important client. Participants rated how much they believed they would be engaged in the meeting through statements like “I would exert my full effort” and “My mind would be focused while completing work in my group.”
The importance of self-disclosure
The results showed the importance of self-disclosure in helping value minorities perform better in the workplace, Dumas said. Those in the minority who were told that they shared information about their personal life – such as what they did over the weekend – anticipated feeling more engaged than those value minorities in the non-disclosure condition.
Self-disclosure helped boost engagement among value minorities by increasing the respect they anticipated from their colleagues, the results showed. Similar results were found among 277 undergraduate students working in real-life teams who were surveyed three times in a seven-week period over one semester.
All the findings revealed in the lab experiment were also found in this real-life work group. One key here was that team members rated how engaged each person was on their team project. “We found that others on the team noticed that people whose values clashed with the majority didn’t engage as much in the work of the group,” Dumas said. “But that negative effect was lessened if the value minorities talked about themselves in the group.”
The key in all the studies was the importance of people talking about themselves in the workplace – not about areas where they disagree, but just about their everyday life experiences. “What happens is that when people talk about themselves, they feel more respected – and they feel invested in the success of the group, they feel engaged,” she said.
Dumas explained that self-disclosure helps because it “humanizes” value minorities to the group. People may feel uncomfortable being a part of a workgroup that doesn’t share their values, but if they pick out something they do feel comfortable sharing with the group, it can create a connection.
The study is relevant to organizations seeking to capitalize upon the benefits of minority perspectives in the workforce but suggests that a critical first step is to prioritize the experience of value minorities and the decreased sense of social worth that can accompany this experience. By fostering an environment conducive to self-disclosure, organizations can help to alleviate the discomfort associated with value dissimilarity, thereby ensuring that all people, including the value minority, feel respected and are maximally engaged at work, she concluded.