“Protecting Hader is an Israeli interest," Communications Minister Ayoub Kara, who is of Druse origin, said.
By CHARLES BYBELEZER/THE MEDIA LINEUpdated: NOVEMBER 8, 2017 08:14A DRUSE man watches the fighting in Syria from the Israeli side of the Golan Heights(photo credit: REUTERS)
Israel made a public commitment over the weekend to protect Druse villages located beyond its borders in enemy territory.The declaration came after nine civilians were killed and dozens wounded in two terrorist attacks in the village of Hader, located some 4 km. inside the Syrian-held part of the Golan Heights.During subsequent fighting between Assad regime forces and rebels, a resident of the Israeli Druse village of Majdal Shams was wounded by spillover gunfire.The al-Qaida linked Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (formerly the al-Nusra Front) claimed responsibility for the Hader bombings and said it was launching a campaign to capture border towns under Syrian government control. In response, an Israel Defense Forces spokesman affirmed that “the [army] is ready and prepared to assist the residents of [Hader], and will prevent the harming or conquering of the village because of our deep commitment to the Druse population.”In 1957, the Israeli government designated the Druse – who practice a monotheistic religion that evolved out of Shi’ite Islam in the 11th century – a distinct ethnic minority at the request of their communal leaders.Relations have long been good between Israeli Jews and the Druse, who are generally supportive of the state, serve in the military, contribute to all sectors of the economy and are represented across the political spectrum. Today, there are some 150,000 Druse living in Israel, mainly in the North.But not all is rosy, as some 20,000 Druse were separated from their relatives in Syria when the IDF conquered half of the Golan Heights in the Six Day War. For many, this remains a source of contention that has manifested in a refusal to become Israeli citizens. Some Druse continue to openly identify as Syrian, although this trend has shown signs of reversing since the outbreak of the civil war there.To indicate the sensitivity of the matter, following Friday’s attack hundreds of Israeli Druse held a demonstration along the northern border in a show of solidarity with their Syrian brethren. Israeli Druse parliamentarian Akram Hasson lost four family members in the Hader violence.In an episode two years ago, tensions boiled over when an IDF ambulance transporting wounded Syrian fighters was attacked by Druse residents in northern Israel, reportedly out of anger over the targeting by jihadists of towns along the border, which resulted in the killing of more than 20 Syrian Druse over a short period.While the assault on the army vehicle was widely denounced at the time – including by Druse community leaders – Jerusalem remains finely attuned to the precarious situation, which largely accounts for its pledge to defend the Syrian villages.
According to Communications Minister Ayoub Kara, who is of Druse origin, “protecting Hader is an Israeli interest – first, because the Druse in Israel are loyal citizens and also because it is important for the military to prevent extremists from operating along the border, including the Iranians, Hezbollah or Sunni terrorist groups.”Kara does not believe that such a policy will necessitate direct military intervention. He told The Media Line that “Israel has enough eyes to know what is going on around the border and therefore will not have any need to send forces into Syria.“We will act carefully and with clever steps all the while being cautious,” he declared.Eliezer Tzafrir, a former Mossad agent who headed the agency’s operations in Iran, Lebanon and Iraqi Kurdistan, agrees that the Jewish state has an “unwritten moral obligation” to the Druse because “they are a great partner in the nation.” Accordingly, he related to The Media Line, “if a situation arises whereby Israel needs to take action to protect those in Syria, then it will be done from afar, whether by tank artillery or air strikes.“It is not illogical that Israel might even arm Syrian Druse communities,” he concluded.Indeed Jerusalem’s decision may be a calculated risk in order to assert itself in Syria at a time when the future of the country is being shaped. “Israel has not been a player in the war and has little influence especially due to a lack of American involvement,” Israeli security analyst Yossi Melman explained to The Media Line. However, he highlighted, by transforming rhetoric into discernible action to enforce its “redlines” along the border, the IDF will be sending a clear message to the Iranians and its Shi’ite proxies that it will not accept their presence in the area.While Melman revealed that the government has forged a tacit understanding with local Druse to defend their Syrian counterparts if they come under attack, he likewise does not envision the IDF putting “boots on the ground.” Rather, any intervention will likely take the form of “ artillery, rockets and air strikes if need be.”But such a scenario could easily escalate, especially when viewed against the backdrop of two recent confrontations in which the Syrian army targeted Israeli warplanes conducting cross-border missions to prevent the transfer of advanced weaponry to Hezbollah.In another incident late last month, five rockets were fired from Syria into Israel in what Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman described as a deliberate act carried out by a Hezbollah cell at the directive of the group’s leader Hassan Nasrallah.In response, the Israeli army struck three Syrian artillery positions, bringing into stark focus the fact that forces loyal to Iran and President Bashar Assad – who according to Liberman green-lighted the missile barrage – are to some degree entrenched along the border. This, in turn, raises the specter of a potential unwanted direct clash with the regime or Iranian proxies should Israel up its military activities in support of the Syrian Druse.While the primary responsibility of all governments is to protect its citizenry, this has heightened significance in Israel given the perpetual threat of attack. But there is a fine line between defending one’s own population and communities abroad, even if there exists a deep affinity to towards the latter.