The meaning behind the Saudi condemnation of Israel’s attack on Iran.
The report emphasized that US officials have become increasingly worried that captagon trade in the region has the ability to destabilize the Middle East entirely.
Each country—while referencing “sovereignty” and “de-escalation”—chooses to avoid condemning Israel outright, instead placing emphasis on the broader threats to regional stability.
While some feared escalation, Israel's allies said the strikes were a necessary step in protecting the region.
Saudi Arabia's statement came after a Sunday report that National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir arrived at the Temple Mount entrance with an entourage.
“It’s masquerading as a building today, but it’s so much more,” said Michael Dyke, chief executive officer of the project.
The decision was made after the channel aired a report calling former Hamas, and Hezbollah leaders, as well as Iran’s Quds Force, the “faces of terrorism.”
Historically, Saudi Arabia and Egypt were the two pillars of stability for the region, and both are friends of the United States.
Iran's Foreign Minister met with Saudi and Qatari leaders to strengthen regional ties, signaling Iran's intent to counter Israel's influence.
In a Sept. 18 speech, MbS said the kingdom would not recognize Israel without the creation a Palestinian state, suggesting a deal may be near impossible for the foreseeable future.
JPOST Digital Library
