Friedman sharply criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing him of prioritizing personal survival over national security due to his ongoing corruption charges.
The Diaspora Affairs Ministry ministry responded to the NYT report, asserting that the paper's claims were "baseless."
Since the beginning of the war, news outlets have been quick to tell partial stories of events in the West Bank and face no backlash when the whole truth comes to light.
Previous studies show criticism of the Hamas attack vanished from the NY Times. New Data suggests that this apathy also applies to Hamas's sexual violence
The sharp criticisms came not only from Jews and Israelis but, surprisingly, also from pro-Palestinians, who claimed that the newspaper was actually pro-Israel. So what is the truth?
The 2012 deposition came during divorce proceedings from his second wife, Mary Richardson Kennedy, the Times reported, as he argued his earning power had been diminished by his cognitive struggles.
"Ultimately, the truth is bound to prevail," says Tamar Sternthal, director of CAMERA’S Israel office.
Some Israeli officials in the report said that rooting out Hamas terrorists may take years, US officials said its leadership remains settled in an underground network of tunnels.
The previous night, at around 1 a.m., pro-Palestinian protesters blocked the drive way of The New York Times printing facility in Queens.
The organization said they won for “chronicling Israel’s bombardment and invasion of their homeland, Gaza. The two photographed the conflict from its opening hours on Oct. 7."
JPOST Digital Library
